Restumping, Reblocking and Underpinning: What's the Difference?
The short answer, because it’s the reason most people land here:
- Restumping and reblocking are the same job. Two words, one piece of work. Reblocking is the older Victorian term.
- Underpinning is a different job entirely. It deals with footings and the ground, not the posts a floor sits on.
- Relevelling and house levelling describe an outcome, not a method. Any of the above can achieve it.
- Jack and pack is a specific method — and the cheapest one.
That’s the whole answer. The rest of this page explains why the distinction matters when you’re holding two quotes that appear to be for different things and aren’t — or appear to be for the same thing and aren’t.
Restumping and reblocking: same job, two words
A house with a suspended timber floor sits on a grid of posts. Floorboards on joists, joists on bearers, bearers on posts, posts in the ground. Replacing those posts is the job.
In Victoria it has two names. Restumping is the more common term now. Reblocking is the older one, and it comes from “blocks” — what the posts were called in Victoria before “stumps” became standard usage. [[VERIFY — this etymology is widely repeated in the trade but source it before publishing as fact, or soften to “the term is generally understood to come from…”]]
Some operators use one word, some the other, some both. There is no technical distinction. If you get one quote for restumping and one for reblocking, you are looking at quotes for the same work and you can compare them directly.
Worth knowing: “reblocking” is distinctively Victorian. It has real search volume here and very little interstate, which is why sites run from outside Victoria targeting Victorian towns tend to ignore the word entirely. If a company servicing Bendigo never uses it, that’s a small signal about where they’re actually based.
Restumping vs underpinning: genuinely different jobs
This is the distinction that costs people money when they get it wrong, because the price gap runs into tens of thousands.
| Restumping / reblocking | Underpinning | |
|---|---|---|
| What’s replaced | The stumps — the posts holding up a suspended floor | Nothing is replaced. The existing footing is extended or supported deeper |
| What’s wrong | The posts have rotted, split, sunk or been eaten out | The ground won’t carry the load evenly |
| House types | Timber-floored houses on stumps | Brick on strip footings, and slab-on-ground homes |
| Possible on a slab home? | No — there are no stumps | Yes — it’s the only structural option |
| Typical cost | Around $280 – $550 per stump; $12,000 – $30,000 for a full house | Around $1,200 – $2,500 per pier; $15,000 – $40,000+ whole house |
| Engineering | Sometimes | Effectively always — pier design comes from an engineer |
The plain version: restumping fixes what’s standing on the ground. Underpinning fixes the ground.
Which means a house can need both, one, or neither — and it’s entirely possible for the stumps to be perfectly sound while the house is still moving. Underpinning in Bendigo →